![]() But as I said, the two are complementary: Mathematica has a function called TeXForm that takes a StandardForm expression and converts it into $\TeX$ syntax. On the other hand, A Mathematica document can let the user evaluate formulas and manipulate interactive controls in ways that a static document can never allow. The emphasis of $\LaTeX$ is on controlling the exact placement of objects on a page, not the mathematical meaning of those objects. I am sure you could manage to replicate a lot of mathematical typesetting functions of $\LaTeX$ with Mathematica. the extent to which it can be done well.the ease with which something can be done. ![]() First, to address the specific question of "what can $\TeX/\LaTeX$ do that Mathematica cannot," with respect to typesetting, the issue is not so much one of specific capabilities, but rather: In light of the controversy with the open/closed source issues described in another answer, I'd like to amend my answer. The Mathematica notebook can always be published alongside a PDF. ![]() I use both: Mathematica to do computation and $\LaTeX$ for typesetting results. They are more complementary than anything else. $\LaTeX$ is about typesetting and publication-ready articles with fine language-based (as opposed to WYSIWYG) control of layout.Īs such, they really are too different that one can replace or supplant the function of the other. Mathematica is mainly about mathematical computing and interactive content. While it is possible to make nice looking documents in each, they really have two different aims. I use both Mathematica and $\LaTeX$ extensively. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |